Today is week 5 since I saw the first podiatrist, and 4 weeks in the walking boot, 1 week without the walking boot. Overall, 10 weeks dealing with the new foot issue.
I saw a second podiatrist yesterday. I had this appointment booked before I saw the first podiatrist. The doctor yesterday is one of the best in the valley (hence the 6 week wait), so I didn't want to cancel the appointment despite already being on a path with the first doctor. After having done extensive research on my bone stress injury I had the feeling that the first doctor was being far too lenient with my injury. He was hyper focused on plantar fasciitis, he also wasn't going to mention a boot until I asked him as he was walking out the door! I had the sense he was not aware of the seriousness of a navicular stress injury. As per his suggestion (after I brought up the boot idea), I wore it for 4 weeks (he said 6 would be ideal), but let me take it off for my trip to Hawaii. I didn't hike, but I did walk in the sand at times, and yes I had a good amount of foot pain that limited what I could do. I brought my boot with me to Hawaii, but after seeing the conditions - the rain, mud, sand, water, muggy heat - it was all very incompatible for wearing a boot. I probably should have put it back on as it does help with waling pain, but it would have been a major hassle/hindrance to everything. Not the same as when I'm at home sitting at work or going to the gym where it's totally doable. First doctor also had no follow up visits and I was considered released unless something became worse. Anyway, I kept the appointment for yesterday's doctor mainly as a second opinion. He agreed that the 4 weeks was far too short. He took x-rays, compared to 5 week ago x-rays and noted that now there is a suspicious line down the center of my navicular bone so he is calling is a stress fracture. Not all stress fractures present on x-rays, but sometimes they do after a period of time rather than early on. He doesn't agree with the talonavicular joint being the source of pain (two bones colliding as I pronate inwards). Instead he said it is the navicular proper. This is a high risk bone. Treatment needs to be aggressive. He is having me come back in every 3 weeks to test the N-spot - the classic location of pain with navicular injuries. If it still hurts upon palpation, then back in the boot for another 3 weeks. This agrees with literature I've read. It needs to be fully healed and pain free before I go boot free. We are going to watch for a trend. If it gets worse or stays the same in 3 weeks, we do an MRI, consider non weight bearing, etc. He emphasized that naviculars take very, very, very long time to heal. They cannot be rushed. The only thing that did not agree with literature is the 6 weeks of non-weight bearing (NWB). All literature points to this, and he said we don't have to consider non-weight bearing right now, but may in the future. He has seen naviculars heal without NWB. From what I've read, these injuries can take 4-9 months to return to full activity. The quicker return being with those that started with 6 weeks NWB. Ugh, do I go NWB on my own? Tat would be a true PITA if I did go with crutches! Not sure my wrist can take it. So returning to where I left off pre-injury is going to take a while. Pulling out all my mental tricks and tips once again because this could be a longer haul than first thought. I hate the thought of losing strength and functionality with this new injury, the time it will take to build it all back up, reintroduce walking, then weights, then running, etc. It's going to take time.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorA 45 year old active female who tore her ACL in January 2017 (at the age of 40). Reconstructive surgery in February 2017 with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft. Archives
November 2022
|